by Edward Hirsch,
Knopf Doubleday, 2014,
96 pp, hardcover and paperback,
ISBN:  978-0-385-35373-1 (hardcover) and 978-0-8041-7287-5 (paperback)
Buy the Book

Poetry has replaced religion for me as a sustaining force in my life. Often when I go to the Grolier Poetry Book Shop on a Friday night, there are flashbacks to the Chicago synagogue that sustained me through my eighteenth year.  Poets like Marge Piercy and Ed Hirsch — not the synagogue or the Bible — are now the places that I go for spiritual refreshment.  Thanks to poets like the aforementioned and my focus on poetry, I have come to believe that there are high tides and low ebbs in every spiritual tradition. All should be respected, and none should be taken for granted.

Gabriel: A Poem, by Edward Hirsch, has taught me more about the unconditional love a parent must always have for a child than I thought I had learned while teaching and raising children.  Full disclosure: I graduated from the same small college as Ed, who is about ten years younger, so he has always been in my rear view mirror.  We’ve had many good conversations.  I’ve known about his son Gabriel’s unconventional life and the diagnosis of Tourette’s that never quite fit the actual case.

Since hearing a few vague details of Gabriel’s death, I had not been able to fathom the pain that Ed must have been going through — that is, until I read his masterful poem.  The poem is so powerful that I can write to Ed again, and say, I think I understand.  Even though you have a broken heart, you are a fine father.  You will never stop caring for the world’s children and writing poems that care for them.  I can say that his poem is completely accessible to any parent who has reached, with a child, impasses that can be overcome with unconditional love.

While Gabriel was very much alive and full of promise, Hirsch wrote a chapter on elegies, “Three Initiations,” that appears in his now classic How to Read a Poem and Fall in Love with Poetry (1999).  Much of this chapter gives clues to how to approach Gabriel: A Poem, Hirsch’s own heart-rending elegy.  So I use Hirsch’s own words to guide me through.

In the book-length poem, Hirsch mourns and looks for solace in

the act of writing.  He does, he says, “what Freud calls the work of mourning, ritualizing grief and thereby making it more bearable. . . . ” He “turns loss into remembrance”:

I peered down into his face

And for a moment I was taken aback

Because it was not Gabriel

It was just some poor kid

Whose face looked like a room

That had been vacated.

Again, I turn Hirsch’s own words, from How to Read a Poem, to what I hope has happened for him in Gabriel: “The elegy opens up a space for retrospect (‘I see now’), for overwhelming personal feeling, and it drives a wordless anguish toward verbal articulation.”  Again the parent at his child’s bedside, Hirsch gains that tender view:

But then I looked more intently

At his heavy eyelids

And fine features

The elegy also “establishes a precise relationship” between Hirsch and his beloved son.  Hirsch reaches the point he describes by immersing himself in the poetry of grief.  In this process, he passes through a white-hot intensity, out of which comes utter honestly about his loss, which finally brings him to — for this reader, and fervently I hope for my friend — a true “richness of feeling” for his departed son.

He had always been a restive sleeper

Now he was weirdly still

My reckless boy

By praising Gabriel as “My reckless boy,” Hirsch also names the most recent of his son’s dysfunctions and arrives at some sort of understanding.

Another clue of how Hirsch feels for his son comes in his glimpse back to the Humanities class in which a young Grinnell teacher named Carol Parssinen led him to discover the healing power of The Iliad.  Homer’s epic “opened up a space in me that made it possible to name what I would feel. . . . ”  His descriptions of Gabriel are infused with much of that power:

Dressed up for a special occasion

He liked that navy-blue suit

And preened over himself in the mirror

Hey college boy the guy called out

On the street in Northampton

You look sharp in those new duds

Hirsch says that he loved how “unflinching” Homer was: “I recognized [the Iliad’s] demonic power, its outsize emotion and epic grief.  I was wounded by its truth.  And I was also healed by it.”  Finally, we can only hope that what Hirsch learned about that ancient poet’s poetry — “I was also healed by it” — is also true today about his own words to Gabriel.

— Mark Schorr

Brittany Cavallaro and Rebecca Hazelton,
Black Lawrence Press, 2014,
28 pages, paper, $8.95,
ISBN:  978-1-62557-999-7
Buy this Book

Probably the finest essay on poetry I’ve read this year is Matthew Buckley Smith’s “Why Poems Don’t Make Sense,” which can be found here in 32 poems.  In it, he explains what sense is, how it differs from logic, and what nonsense entails, while illuminating the concept of theory of mind in relation to poetry.  It’s a smart, accessible, and important piece.

I start there because at the time I first read Smith’s essay, I was also in the midst of reading No Girls No Telephones by Brittany Cavallaro and Rebecca Hazelton.  A collaborative chapbook of paired poems that take their shared titles from lines of Berryman, NGNT comes with an author’s note at the end that I’ll reproduce here in part, as it’s necessary for understanding how I’m coming at this review:

Authors’ Note:
Brittany had the idea of writing an opposite imitation of a

John Berryman Dream Song, and suggested that Rebecca write

an opposite of that opposite.  It was a strange game of literary

translation.

Simone Muench blurbs on the cover that the poems operate as a game of telephone to filter the sense of poems by John Berryman through Cavallaro and Hazelton.  The authors’ note explains the process whereby noise was added to the system, so to speak, with opposites of opposites reflecting off one another to introduce distortion.  As you might expect, just like in a game of telephone, the message at times becomes garbled well beyond lyricism, crossing into true nonsense.  I tried all the usual ways of maximizing the poems’ content: reading aloud to myself, reading to someone else, reading out of order.  Nothing worked.  And yes, there’s a natural pleasure born of unexpected and unexpectable constructions, but I kept thinking about Smith’s essay and my native distaste for nonsense.

So, brief aside, what’s wrong with nonsense?  To me, it smacks of a writer who, though having nothing to say, nevertheless seeks an audience.  And was that what was happening in NGNT?  No, but I was having a hard time figuring out what was happening.  While I’m only marginally familiar with Cavallaro, Hazelton’s poems are not merely sensible but frequently profound.  The meaning had to be in there somewhere.  Berryman may be ethereal or even transcendental but he isn’t nonsensical, and the best games of telephone retain echoes of the intended message despite the accidents of flawed transmission.

Then, once I saw it, how had I not seen it?  There aren’t just structural parallels between the paired poems; they are like transparencies to be laid one over the other.  I suspect my initial blindness to this came from holding too tightly to the game of telephone concept.  I kept trying to understand it through that lens, however figurative, despite my deepening frustration.  While I can certainly see how it was relevant to the composition of the book, it put me on false footing to assume this would be the most fruitful way to read the poems.
This misstep was admittedly my own fault.  That the method of composition does not imply the method of interpretation may be self-evident to others, but this was a learning moment for me. Anyway, what was genuinely captivating about the book was how two strophes of nonsense, on opposing pages, would give rise to something sensible if non-concrete, “sense without reference,” when considered simultaneously, and that this sensibility resonated as authentically Berrymanesque.  It’s not the intuitive way to read poems, and it’s not exactly easy, but it taught me something.  Not in the way of aphorism or analogy, or any of the pleasant methods through which I expect to encounter a lesson in most poems, but by frustrating my understanding and then composing sense in a manner I had never before experienced.

The last thing I want to get into is how Cavallaro and Hazelton play with opposites throughout NGNT.  I’m fascinated by opposites, not so much in the antonymic dark / light, land / sea kinds of couplings, but when we think, for example, of the opposite of a park.  The first thing that comes to my mind is wasteland, but what about office the opposite of park?  This way of thinking can work as a lever for the imagination.  For instance, what if the opposite of plant is not animal, but something that thrives on moonlight and vodka?  The opening lines of the poems “Mission Accomplished” demonstrate this effect to highlight a mode of seeing and thinking that is acutely poetic:

Her inner life was left on a marked tree

And its opposite:

Our outer hearts are found in an unmarked grave

That’s just for the flavor of what’s happening.  Overall, my experience of reading NGNT was non-recreational but rewarding. I don’t know that it’s exactly avant-garde, but for me it expanded the possibilities of nonsense in ways far more sophisticated than the attempts made in the vast bulk of conceptual poetry I’ve come across.  And it has me thinking I perhaps ought to mail my copy to Mr. Smith.

— Andrew Purcell